LABEL

SPECIAL EVENT
Label
Tate Britain
Saturday 24 November 2012, 13.00 – 17.00

20121119-184427.jpg

Tracey Moberly, Mam
Courtesy Tracey Moberly

You are invited to join us on a spirited quest to explore questions of identity and belonging. Amidst pumping bass lines and crowd mayhem, LABEL will explore the one question that has intrigued mankind for centuries: “Who am I?”

LABEL features live acoustic performances with Q+A sessions from Speech Debelle and Shakka, DJs Stööki Sound, plus installations and workshops with Soulful Creative.
Come and work with leading urban creatives on a giant collaborative piece that will transform the façade of Tate Britain, choose how to represent your super-talented self in a portrait taken by our photographer, join a guerrilla mosaics workshop to re-think emblems of Britishness or create a unique label that reflects who you really are with artist Chloe Cooper.

LABEL is curated by Tate Collective as part of the Great British Art Debate. What does Britishness mean to you? Join this audacious retort to stereotypical ideas about Britishness.

Follow The Great British Art Debate on Twitter @GBArtDebate and on Facebook
Sponsored by the Heritage Lottery Funded & Great British Art Debate
Tags:
Art and ideas

///

Carousel

In popular culture

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MoKtk8L77-U

The carousel slide projector was highlighted in the popular TV-series Mad Men (Season One, Episode 13, titled “The Wheel”) as a product for advertiser Don Draper to pitch. There, it was named the “Carousel,” instead of “The Wheel”, because it was nostalgic and let its viewers travel through their memories as a child would, “around and around and back home again”.[4]

From: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MoKtk8L77-U

///

“The magical power of the projected image is unique to the medium. A beam of light, thrown out from the slide or film projector, bears sequences of images that reconstitute and take form when the light meets an opaque surface. Projected images are at once solid and transparent…The beam of light is a powerful sign of memory and the visual imagination. It transmits ghost images, figures that live only through the power of the projective apparatus and die as the picture vanishes. Projected in darkness, the cone of light traces the genesis of the images from projector to screen. It is spellbinding and full of promise”

– Lynda Nead, The Haunted Gallery

///

(Red Square Pet Heaven)

Some of my new digital prints can be seen at:

http://www.saatchionline.com/profiles/portfolio/id/387522

///

’120 Days & Nights of Staggering & Stammering: (Red Square Pet Heaven)’

Digital Photographic Print. 92cm x 122cm

///

’120 Days & Nights of Staggering & Stammering: (Vampire Days)’

Digital Photographic Print. 92cm x 122cm

///

’120 Days & Nights of Staggering & Stammering: (China Hall Red Square)’

Digital Photographic Print. 92cm x 122cm

///

Old Shows New Thoughts?

Fantastic!

The Catacombs under St. Pancras Church, Euston Road, London WC1.

Thursday 26th June – Sunday 29th June 2003

Curated by Dolly Thompsett.

///

///

Mark Ingham: “Its Good For You Cold 2005. SLR Camera, Slide, Torch.

///

Mark Ingham: ‘Suez with RMJI’ 2005. SLR Camera, Slide, Torch.

///

There are three possible accounts that would serve this show not quite equally well.

First, imagine lots of Ken Russells. Russells connected by being at college together, being youngish, being already slightly successful. Russells acutely, fantastically sensitive to serious climactic changes, changes that effect the reception of work. Imagine our genteel Russells ushering in an equal number of head-down shambling dry Oliver Reeds for ladylike recuperation. Imagine all those strained director’s chairs.

Alternatively, imagine that it was possible to dissociate a part of experience – as a part characteristic against a whole. Doesn’t something fantastic necessarily emerge from an indeterminate background? Isn’t there always the risk that the psychological and poetic, dramatic and pedagogic components of a fantastic scenario are mistaken so that a foreground (where the proposed action is) obscures the shady workings of an interesting background? In Macbeth for instance, the shifting Dunsinane woods, stripped of symbolic, dramatic function – relevance – against a large significant backdrop of intrigue, would hardly seriously support the play as an object of interest.

Of course it’s a species of dramatic short-termism to isolate or regulate a moment of realisation, the optical point of the resolution of an effect as being an effect. A show like Fantastic! might, through integrating or itemising or casting multiple positions, multiple effects – spotlight and suspend dramatic resolutions.

Thirdly, imagine a complex arrangement between a varied group of artists and a curator where what would be required would be a degree of irresolution directed by experience. The type of name you might name something like this would be something allusive – it would come slowly tripping-off the tongue with an alien coating of protective spittle or glycerate. It would have an ! And it would be indeterminately a spontaneous or considered (but quick) value-judgement; suggestive or flatteningly literal. But there would be connotations of serious, archetypal historic categorisation – The Fantastic – and there would be oppositional associations even directed towards the technical sublime; as there would be knowingly, absolutely contemporary invocations of the aesthetic.

The third option accommodates the first two in a zone of enriched darkness improbably lit by individual works underground where Dolly Thompsettˆs show featuring Alice Anderson, Heike Cavallo, Ole Hagen, Ahn Sung Hee, Mark Ingham, Liane Lang, Dee Meaden, Salomé Voegelin and herself will be, for a short time, Fantastic!

Matthew Arnatt  2003

///

///

“The viewer of a Fantastic image hesitates, wonders whether what he is seeing is real, if what he is confronted with is indeed reality, or whether it is no more than an illusion. The ambiguity is sustained to the end of the encounter: reality or magic? Truth or illusion? Which brings us to the very heart of the Fantastic. In a world which is indeed our world, the one we know and recognise, we perceive an event which cannot be explained by the laws of this same familiar world. The person who sees the event must opt for one of two possible solutions: either he is a victim of an illusion of the senses – or else the event has indeed taken place, in which case reality is controlled by laws unknown to us. The Fantastic occupies the duration of this uncertainty. Once we choose a rational explanation or a supernatural one, we emerge from the Fantastic and enter the Uncanny or the Marvellous. The Fantastic is that hesitation experienced by a person who knows only the laws of nature, confronting an apparently supernatural event. ‘I nearly reached the point of believing,’ that is the formula which sums up the spirit of the Fantastic. Either total faith or total incredulity would lead us beyond the fantastic: it is hesitation which sustains its life. ” (Misquote, Todorov, “The Fantastic: A Structural Approach”)

Fantastic! was curated by Dolly Thompsett.

///

Artists in FANTASTIC! from a website created by Tom Ingham at www.suchlovelypictures.co.uk

1 Alice Anderson

2 Heike Cavallo

3 Ole Hagen

4 Mark Ingham

5 Liane Lang

6 Dee Meaden

7 Ahn Sung Hee

8 Dolly Thompsett

Salomé Voegelin

///

Mark Ingham: ‘Suez with RMJI’ 2005. SLR Camera, Slide, Torch.

///

SCOPE New Photographic Practices

Visual Art Centre Gallery, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China

9 – 20 December 2011

Mervyn Arthur
Jordan Baseman
Bernd Behr
Sutapa Biswas
Veronique Chance
William Cobbing
Paul Coldwell
Cornford and Cross
Sarah Dobai
Lorrice Douglas
Neil Drabble
Lucy Gunning
Sigune Hamann
Thomas Haywood
Mark Ingham
Tania Kovats
Jean-Louis Lanteri Laura
Chrystel Lebas
Johanna Love
Anna Mossman
Martin Newth
Helen Robertson
Lois Rowe
Finlay Taylor
Danny Treacy
Chris Wainwright
Dave Webster

SCOPE New Photographic Practices is accompanied by a Camberwell Press publication, which features a new essay ‘Flow’ by Roger Hargreaves.

The photographic practices brought together for this exhibition and publication provide a broad scope of how photographic and lens based media may be used in order to have a visceral and conceptual impact. The methods on show demonstrate the way that artists might pick and choose from the approaches, processes and debates that have arisen through the medium’s history. This collection of work features film, video and photography that demand a renegotiation of the relationship between camera, subject and viewer.